bzcomputers
Customer
The following is in reference to vBDownloads rewrites:
1) I've noticed that some download page url rewrites contain a "-a" while others don't. Why do half of my rewrites contain it and half don't? (I see this by looking at the .xml produced for the downloads)
2) Rewrites are currently not being routed to the specific rewrite url. Both the following urls will take you to the same page.
Option 1:
Option2:
I see this happening elsewhere in DBSEO rewrites but everywhere else it appears Option2 is automatically forwarded to the correct rewrite url of Option 1, but this is not occurring within downloads rewrites.
This lack of a 301 redirect is causing some issues, including duplicate content pages in Google. At appears at some point some urls had the "-a" in them and now don't don't and vice versa. Now both versions are indexed.
1) I've noticed that some download page url rewrites contain a "-a" while others don't. Why do half of my rewrites contain it and half don't? (I see this by looking at the .xml produced for the downloads)
2) Rewrites are currently not being routed to the specific rewrite url. Both the following urls will take you to the same page.
Option 1:
Code:
www.mysitename.com/forum/downloads/download-category/download-filename-234.html
Option2:
Code:
www.mysitename.com/forum/downloads/download-category/i-can-put-anything-here-and-the-link-will-still-work-as-long-as-this-part-is-at-least-one-letter-or-number-long-followed-by-the-download-id-234.html
I see this happening elsewhere in DBSEO rewrites but everywhere else it appears Option2 is automatically forwarded to the correct rewrite url of Option 1, but this is not occurring within downloads rewrites.
This lack of a 301 redirect is causing some issues, including duplicate content pages in Google. At appears at some point some urls had the "-a" in them and now don't don't and vice versa. Now both versions are indexed.